Loading…
All questions
Shipments

What would you check before flying equipment that contains batteries?

With the 2026 guidance in place, what information should a supplier provide before an air booking is treated as ready?

12 replies

  1. Get the exact battery type and product configuration first. Batteries installed in equipment, packed with equipment and shipped on their own can require different treatment.
  2. Have a trained dangerous-goods specialist review the shipment against current rules and operator requirements. This isn't something I'd resolve from a product photo and an old booking.
  3. Ask for the relevant manufacturer test information tied to the actual battery model. A document for a similar-looking battery doesn't answer the question.
  4. The supplier should confirm the packed quantity and final configuration. A spare battery added at the last minute can change what the shipping team needs to review.
  5. Check airline acceptance before arranging an irreversible pickup. Meeting a general requirement doesn't mean every operator accepts the cargo on every service.
  6. Use the current guidance for any state-of-charge requirement and exceptions. Don't recycle last year's instruction without confirming it still fits this configuration.
  7. Keep the technical review separate from the commercial urgency. A customer deadline is a reason to start early, not a reason to skip classification.
  8. Ask who is responsible for packaging, marking and documentation, and make sure that person has the right training. Vague ownership is where avoidable mistakes creep in.
  9. If the product has been repaired or returned, say so at the start. Its condition may matter to whether and how it can travel.
  10. That point about returns matters. An ordinary outbound process should not automatically be reused for a damaged item coming back.
  11. Save the final approved configuration with the shipment record. Otherwise a later reviewer may be looking at a packing plan that was never actually used.
  12. For recurring products, build an approved data pack and review it when the model or rules change. It saves time without pretending that acceptance lasts forever. Keep the battery model, product configuration, reviewed documents and approval context together. If purchasing substitutes a component, that should trigger a check instead of silently inheriting the old shipping decision. The pack is a way to preserve good evidence, not a shortcut around a qualified review.

Write a reply

Loading…